STOGROUPs and SMS [DB2 9 for z/OS]

With today’s posting we return to our examination of the new features of DB2 9 for z/OS. With V9, DB2 storage groups can be better integrated with SMS storage classes.

Prior to DB2 9, you could only spcify SMS storage classes, data classes, and management classes when using explicit IDCAMS defines. You could use those SMS specifications with your SMS ACS routings, but ACS routines filter on data set names, so those routines could become large and unwieldy if you defined multiple different combinations for different data sets.

The improvement in DB2 9 modifies the CREATE and ALTER STOGROUP statements to utilize SMS classes. This can greatly improve ease-of-use by minimizing the manual effort involved in managing DB2 data sets using DFSMS.

There are three new keywords in the CREATE STOGROUP syntax. You can specify just one, two or even all three of them on one CREATE STOGROUP statement:

• DATACLAS - influences characteristics such as the data set control block (DCB), striping, extended format usage, extended addressability usage and so on.
  
• MGMTCLAS – defines data set frequency of volume backups, migration requirement and related tasks.
  
• STORCLAS - define guaranteed spaced and other requirements.

DB2 will not check to verify that the data class, management class, or storage class specified actually exist. In that regard, the parameters are designed to work the same way that the VCAT and VOLUMES parameters have always worked. When the STOGROUP is used to allocate a data set, the specified classes are passed to DFSMS, which does the actual work.

The intent of this posting is not to act as an SMS tutorial. If you wish to investigate the details of SMS in more depth, consult the IBM manual titled -- z/OS DFSMS Implementing System-Managed Storage, SC26-7407.

Additionally, these same parameters have been added to the ALTER STOGROUP statement. When you alter SMS class names of a DB2 STOGROUP, this does not affect the existing data sets. However, if you run the REORG, RECOVER, or LOAD REPLACE utility, DB2 deletes the associated data set and redefines it using the new description of the storage group.

Finally, to accommodate the metadata for these new parameters, three new columns have been added to the SYSIBM.SYSSTOGROUP DB2 catalog table: DATACLAS, MGMTCLAS, and STORCLAS.

Implicitly Created Database Objects [DB2 9 for z/OS]

Today we continue our series on new features in DB2 V9 with a quick discussion of implicitly created database objects. To understand what this is, let’s first review the way DB2 works today (pre-V9). If you issue a CREATE TABLE statement and do not specify the database and table space into which the table is to be created, DB2 will automagically create a new table space in the default database (DSNDB04).

Not being content with that, DB2 9 extends this capability with the ability to implicitly create additional types of database objects. By coding your CREATE TABLE statement with the proper options you can implicitly create any or all of the following:

Database

Table space

Index to enforce Primary Key uniqueness

Index to enforce unique constraint

ROWID index (if the ROWID is defined as GENERATED BY DEFAULT)

LOB structures (LOB table space, auxiliary table, auxiliary index)

OK, so how does this happen? Let’s go down the list. If you fail to specify the IN clause on a CREATE TABLE, DB2 works a bit differently. In the past, DB2 would simply create an implicit table space in DSNDB04. As of DB2 9, the database is involved as well. DB2 will either create an implicit database or use a previously implicitly created database. The names of these implicitly created databases will range from DSN00001 to DSN60000. The first time, DB2 will create DSN00001, the second DSN00002, and so on until we reach DSN60000. The next time, DB2 will wrap around and start again from the beginning, using existing implicitly created databases. For the implicitly created databases, the STOGROUP will be set to SYSDEFLT; buffer pool values are determined via DSNZPARMs.

Next up is the table space. Although DB2 has supported implicitly created table spaces forever, there are some twists in DB2 9. First of all, you cannot create simple table spaces any longer, so all implicitly created table spaces will be segmented. In compatibility mode (CM), a implicitly created table spaces will be defined as SEGSIZE 4 and LOCKSIZE ROW. After migrating to new function mode (NFM) your implicitly created table spaces will be created as partition by growth table spaces. The options uses will be SEGSIZE 4, DSSIZE 4G, MAXPARTITIONS 256, LOCKSIZE ROW, and LOCKMAX SYSTEM.

As for the rest of the objects in the list, these system-required objects will always be implicitly created if the table space is created implicitly. For indexes that support the primary key or unique constraints, the names will be generated using a combination of the table name and randomly generated characters.

OK, so now that you know about the ability of DB2 9 to implicitly create objects, let me give you some advice. Whenever possible, don’t rely on it. It is much better, if at all feasible, for your DBAs to explicitly create and name all database objects as needed. Yes, it takes more time, but it gives you more control. You can explicitly decide which objects go into which database; you can explicitly set paramters; etc.

So, this is a nice new feature and it can enable DB2 to do some definitional things for you automatically. But most DBAs will want to continue to do things the traditional way, that is, building their DDL themselves without relying on implicitly

Implicitly Hidden Columns [DB2 9 for z/OS]

Another nice new feature deep in the bowels of DB2 9 for z/OS is the ability to hide columns from the SELECT * statement. As far back as anyone can remember the advice has been given to avoid using SELECT * in application programs. But I still see it every now and then.

Now don't get me wrong, SELECT * is a nice shorthand when you are writing quick & dirty SQL using SPUFI or some other ad hoc SQL tool. But it does not belong in your application programs because a subsequent ALTER to add a column will cause the program to fail because there are now more columns being returned than the programmer coded into the program.

"OK," you may be asking, "so what? I thought you were writing about DB2 9 here?" Fair enough. DB2 9 for z/OS adds the ability to code IMPLICITLY HIDDEN on the column specification of a CREATE or ALTER TABLE statement. By coding IMPLICITYLY HIDDEN, the column will not be visible in the result of a SQL statement unless you explicitly refer to the column by name. So, SELECT * will not return any implicitly hidden columns to the result set.

For example, in the following table C2 is implicitly hidden and will not be returned as the result of SELECT *:

CREATE TABLE T1
(C1 SMALLINT NOT NULL,
C2 CHAR(10) IMPLICITLY HIDDEN,
C3 TIMESTAMP)
IN DB.TS;

This has some obvious beneifts. First of all, if you are one of those shops where programmers did not follow the no SELECT * in programs rule, then you can simply add every new column with the IMPLICITLY HIDDEN attribute and those SELECT * statements will keep on running because they won't see the new columns.

Or, you might want to take a more comprehensive approach, and specify every column (except one, perhaps the key) of every new (or modified) table as IMPLICITLY HIDDEN. If every column except the key is hidden, then a SELECT * won't return anything except the key - you'll have to explicitly specify all of those other columns to get them into your result sets. Of course, this negates the ability to use SELECT * for quick & dirty SPUFI queries because implicitly hidden columns will be hidden there, too.

There are a few caveats on the usage of IMPLICITLY HIDDEN. You cannot specify IMPLICITLY HIDDEN for a column that is defined as a ROWID, or a distinct type that is based on a ROWID. Additionally, IMPLICITLY HIDDEN must not be specified for all columns of a table.

Database Definition on Demand [DB2 9 for z/OS]

As you probably know, online schema evolution (sometimes referred to as “online schema change”) was one of the key new features of DB2 V8. But, as its name implies, its capabilities continue to evolve. With V9, online schema evolution expands to simplify more types of database definition changes. The new term IBM is using for this in V9 is Database Definition On Demand (DDOD).

One of the nice new components provided by DDOD in V9 is that online table space reorganization is significantly improved. Today, when reorganizing just a couple of partitions in a partitioned table space the BUILD2 phase takes a long time to complete. V8 removed the outage for DPSIs, and now V9 removes the BUILD2 phase for all types of secondary indexes.

Another new DDOD capability supports replacing one table quickly with another. This is accomplished via cloning and the technique can even avoid the need to REBIND packages. Cloning allows you to generate, in the same table space, a new table with the same structure as the original table. After creating the clone you can do with it what you want – LOAD, DELETE, INSERT, UPDATE, etc. data – and then exchange the clone table name with the current table name. In this way you can keep the existing table operational while you work on the next “generation” of that table in its clone. When the clone is ready, you EXCHANGE it with the existing table. Nice, huh?

How about being able to rename a column within your table or rename an index? V9 provides the ability to do both! No longer do you have to DROP and re-CREATE in order to rename columns and indexes.

DB2 V9 also introduces a new type of table space that combines the attributes of segmented and partitioned. It is called a universal table space. Universal table spaces offer improved space management for variable length rows. This is so because it uses the space map page with more free space information like segmented table spaces. Also, like segmented table spaces, universal table spaces deliver improved mass delete performance and you can immediately reuse the table segments after the mass delete.

There are two types of universal table spaces:

• Partition-by-growth: this type of universal table space will partition the data as it grows without the need to specify key ranges. This type of universal table space is beneficial for tables that will grow over time and/or need the additional limits afforded by partitioning, but can benefit from the performance of segmented. You can define more than one table in this type of universal table space if you wish.
• Range-partitioned: this type of universal table space requires a key range for partitioning – and it can contain only a single table. This is basically adding segmentation to the existing partitioned table space.

Additionally, you can define SMS constructs (MGMTCLAS, DATACLASS, and STORCLAS) on a STOGROUP and you can ALTER those constructs as well. And table space and index logging parameters can be altered.

DB2 V9 even adds a new capability to change the DB2 early code without requiring an IPL.

So, with DB2 9 for z/OS we get more flexibility in modifying our database schemas. And that is a good thing, right?