Tuesday, April 28, 2020

Db2 for z/OS and Managing Database Changes - Part 4

Today brings the fourth, and final installment of our series examining the different types of changes that can be made to database objects and structures in Db2 for z/OS. Part 1 introduced the three types of changes, part 2 examined simple database changes, and part 3 took a look at medium, or pending changes. 


And that brings us to the final type of Db2 schema change, the complex change. A complex change is essentially one that is unsupported by Db2 other than by dropping and then re-creating the database structure with the desired change. Of course, implementing such changes is not as easy as just dropping and re-creating the object.  For example, if you want to add a column to the middle of an existing row, it cannot be done using ALTER, and such, it is a complex change. Of course, this is not the only type of complex change. Any change that is not simple (immediate) or medium (pending) is a complex change and it requires an in-depth series of tasks that will differ based on the database object being changed and the specific change to implement.

An example of the type of activities that may need to be scripted to implement a complex database change include:
  • Retrieve the current definition of the database object by querying the appropriate Db2 Catalog tables, which will be different for each type of object.
  • Retrieve the current definition of any dependent objects as well; for example, if you drop a table, then triggers, views, and indexes are also dropped.
  • Capture all referential constraints for all tables involved in the change (either directly or indirectly).
  • Retrieve all security authorizations that have been granted for all database objects that will be dropped either directly or as a result of cascading drops.
  • Obtain a list of all programs that access impacted tables by using the Db2 Catalog, Db2 Directory, and any other program documentation at your disposal.
  • Unload the data from all tables that will be impacted.
  • Drop the database object to be changed, which in turn drops any dependent objects, revokes authorizations, and invalidates any SQL statements against any impacted tables in any application programs.
  • Recreate the database object with the new specifications by using the definition obtained from the Db2 Catalog earlier.
  • Reload the tables, using the unloaded data obtained earlier.
  • Recreate any referential constraints that may have been dropped.
  • Recreate any triggers, views, and indexes for the table.
  • Recreate the security authorizations captured earlier.
  • Examine each application program to determine whether changes are required for it to continue functioning appropriately.
  • Test thoroughly.

The above list is not meant to be an exhaustive list of everything that must be accomplished for every type of complex schema change that you might have to implement. Instead, the list is intended to convey the intricacies involved in making complex changes and how automation can minimize risk and speed up the process!

Furthermore, it should be clear that complex changes will require an outage to complete. When database objects are dropped applications will no longer be able to access them until the changes are complete and if tables are involved, not until the data has been reloaded.

A well-designed and implemented database schema change solution must be able to understand and implement all of the types of changes covered in this section, and to implement them appropriately. That means that the tool should implement a medium, pending change when possible instead of simply deferring to a complex change. It also means being able to assemble a script of all the appropriate actions required for any type of complex change that the DBA may need to perform.

To work in a modern environment, the tool should also understand DevOps and agile development and integrate into any DevOps pipeline/toolchain seamlessly. 

Obviously, such capabilities require built-in intelligence and knowledge of Db2 for z/OS and its many nuances and features.

Thursday, April 23, 2020

Db2 for z/OS and Managing Database Changes - Part 3

Welcome to the third installment of our series examining the types of database changes that can be performed using Db2 for z/OS. In part 1 we introduced the three types of changes and in part 2 we looked at simple changes. Today we will talk about the next type of change to consider, the medium or pending change.

A pending change requires a little more work than does a simple change, but is much easier to implement than a complex change. The pending change was introduced in DB2 10 and significantly simplifies some types of database change.

Pending changes are supported only for database objects in Universal table spaces. If a change must be made to a structure in a segmented or classic partitioned table space, you cannot use the pending change capability. Pending changes are made in a non-disruptive way using the ALTER statement to make the desired change, but requiring a REORG to drive the actual, underlying change to the database structures. Because a reorganization can be run online, pending changes can be implemented with little, to no downtime on the system. And changes are easier to back off; simply issue the DROP PENDING CHANGES command (as long as no REORG has been run).

With pending changes, Db2 semantically validates the request and checks authorization at execution time as usual, but the change is not actually implemented. It is simply registered in the Db2 Catalog in a table named SYSIBM.SYSPENDINGDDL. When the change is requested, the object goes into an advisory state, AREOR, and the ALTER statement returns an SQLCODE of +610 indicating that the object has been placed into a pending state, but it remains completely available to your applications.

So, as you make deferred ALTER changes Db2 will begin to populate the changes into the SYSIBM.SYSPENDINGDDL table. Each pending change will have a row in the table. Depending upon what you have changed, a single ALTER can produce multiple rows in the SYSPENDINGDDL table.

Your changes are recorded in SYSPENDINGDDL rows as they are made and then applied in that order. For example, you can convert a segmented table space to Universal PBG. And then modify the DSSIZE. These changes are recorded by DB2 in that order and allowed.

It is possible, too, to make multiple changes to the same parameter and have them build up in the pending table. Say that you change the buffer pool for a table space from BP0 to BP32K. And then later change the same table space to BP8K2 before you run a REORG. In this case, you will end up with the TS in the BP8K2 buffer pool and 8K page sizes. DB2 knows and maintains the order of your changes and will get it right when you implement the deferred changes using REORG.

The actual, underlying changes are only made by Db2 when you run the REORG utility using SHRLEVEL CHANGE or REFERENCE. Another way of thinking about this is that only when a Shadow object is being used will Db2 implement pending changes.  Of course, you can still run a REORG using SHRLEVEL NONE but none of your pending changes will be implemented (that is, the changes will still be pending and the Pending Status will not be reset). The REORG can be executed at either the table space or index level… keeping in mind that dependent index changes will be implemented by reorganizing the table space containing the table that the index is built on.

Db2 does not permit combining deferred and immediate ALTERs in a single SQL statement, so be careful about what you are trying to request. Additionally, most immediate ALTERs are not possible while changes are pending.

It is a good idea, though not a requirement, to avoid confusion by materializing pending changes as soon as possible. When you have an Advisory Reorg Pending (AREO*) status clean it up with a REORG as quickly as makes sense. And make sure that you do so before making new changes whenever possible. With multiple changes out there pending to be made, it can be confusing and you may have forgotten all that was requested before. Additionally, there can be performance degradation if you do not clean up that Advisory Reorg Pending (AREO*) status.

Examples of medium changes that can be implemented as pending include converting a segmented table space to a Universal partition-by-growth table space, converting a classic partitioned table space to a Universal partition-by-range table space[7], converting a Universal partition-by-growth table space to RPN[8], changing the DSSIZE[9] of a table space[10], SEGSIZE[11], increasing MAXPARTITIONS, changing MEMBER CLUSTER, dropping a column from a table[12], renaming a column[13], modifying partitioning and rotating partitions, and regenerating an index.

Additionally, as of Db2 12, there is a new capability to set a system parameter that will treat all ALTER COLUMN changes as pending, even though you can change the data type, length, precision, and scale as immediate changes.

Remember that all changes implemented as pending using deferred ALTER require Universal table spaces. For any other type of table space, they are treated as complex changes.


-----------------------------------
[7] The classic partitioned table space must be table-controlled, not index-controlled
[8] Using the PAGENUM RELATIVE parameter
[9] Although the change can be simple/immediate if the data sets have not yet been created and no pending changes have been requested.
[10] Although the change can be simple/immediate if the data sets have not yet been created, no pending changes have been requested or the specified buffer pool is the same size as the current buffer pool.
[11] There are conditions where this can be an immediate, simple change
[12] Some columns drops are not allowed without other changes or require a complex script to implement
[13] Renaming a column becomes a complex change if the column is referenced in a view, index, row permission, column mask, UDG, check constraint or FIELDPROC. The change is also complex if the table containing the column is or is referenced by an MQT, has a trigger, has a VALIDPROC or and EDITPROC with row attributes.

Monday, April 20, 2020

Db2 for z/OS and Managing Database Changes - Part 2

In part 1 of our multi-part series on Db2 for z/OS database change management, we provided an overview of the three types of database change that can be undertaken. In today's post, we are going to examine the first type of change -- the simple database change -- in a little more depth.

Simple database changes are the easiest to implement. A simple database change, typically implemented using the ALTER statement, can be executed immediately upon request. The change is made immediately but may require additional actions to fully implement. For example, if you add a nullable column at the end of a table using ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN the change is made immediately. For all intents and purposes, the addition is complete. However, under the covers, Db2 has not expanded the storage for each row to include space for the column. This happens as the column is accessed and used, or when the table space is reorganized. Applications can use and access the new column without knowing this, however, so the change is immediate; housekeeping to implement the change entirely may occur over time.

Additional examples of simple, immediate changes are most CREATE and DROP statements; altering STOGROUPs; altering most default parameters for databases, table spaces, indexes, and STOGROUPs; renaming tables (packages are invalidated but privileges and indexes are maintained)[1]; renaming indexes; adding a column at the end of a table[2]; changing the data type[3], precision scale of length of a column[4]; identity column parameters, adding and dropping versioning to a temporal table, adding and dropping constraints[5]; activating and deactivating row access control; adding, dropping, and exchanging clone tables; altering, dropping, and refreshing materialized query tables[6]; creating, dropping, and renaming global temporary tables; altering most aspects of user-defined functions and stored procedures; and changing or dropping labels on tables, aliases, and columns. 

Additionally, the "new", Db2 12 TRANSFER OWNERSHIP command is implemented as a simple, immediate change.



[1] Not all types of tables can be renamed. Consult the IBM Db2 SQL Reference manual, page 2163, for types of tables and options that forbid renaming a table.
[2] Adding a column at the end of a table requires that the column be nullable or have a default assigned, otherwise it is a complex change
[3] Can change data type within data type families (text to text, number to number, etc.)
[4] Can change length as an immediate change as long as it is larger, otherwise it is a complex change.
[5] With the caveat that the CHECK utility will have to be run to enforce a check constraint if the CURRENT RULES ‘DB2’ option is in effect
[6] When a materialized query table is dropped, all packages dependent on it are invalidated

Tuesday, April 14, 2020

Db2 for z/OS and Managing Database Changes - Part 1


Today we begin a multi-part series of blog posts taking a look at what is involved in making database changes in a Db2 for z/OS environment. The first thing that DBAs will need is the ability to change all the database objects supported by Db2 for z/OS. There are numerous different types of  database objects and structures that can be created and modified by DDL, and at one point or another, DBAs are called upon to create, alter, and drop every one of them.
But let’s dig a little deeper into what is required. Assume that you are a Db2 DBA who has been given a request to make several changes to database structures. The first thing you must do, of course, is to review the requested changes to make sure they are appropriate. Assuming they are, what is the next step?

You must determine how to go about making each change. At a high level, there are three different types of schema changes: 
  • simple (or immediate), 
  • medium (or pending), and 
  • complex. 

Simple changes can be implemented immediately without requiring intervening actions. Medium changes require a bit more work to implement by running a REORG, and then we have complex changes that require an in-depth script for dropping and re-creating the database object. But not every type of database change request can use each type of schema change method. There are requirements and nuances in deciding which method can be used when.

In our next blog post, we will discuss simple Db2 changes.



Friday, April 10, 2020

IBM Db2 Analytics Accelerator: Time to Upgrade?


This post is about the IBM Db2 Analytics Accelerator, sometimes (and hereinafter) referred to as IDAA.
First of all, for those who don’t know, let’s start with what it is. IDAA is a high-performance component, typically delivered as an appliance, that is tightly integrated with Db2 for z/OS. It delivers high-speed processing for complex Db2 queries to support business-critical reporting and analytic workloads.  

The general idea is to enable HTAP (Hybrid Transaction Analytical Processing) from the same database, on Db2 for z/OS. IDAA stores data in a columnar format that is ideal for speeding up complex queries – sometimes by orders of magnitude.

Now there is a lot more to IDAA, but we won’t cover it here in today’s blog. If you want more details, I direct you to the following links:


Anyway, the real purpose of today’s blog entry is to alert IDAA users that you need to be aware of some recent and upcoming support and version issues.


IDAA Version 7

The current version of IDAA is V7.5; it was announced October 15, 2019 and released for GA December 6, 2019. But many customers are not there yet. This is not surprising given that it has only been about 4 or 5 months since it has become available. Nevertheless, it offers an abundance of great functionality and usability improvements. At the top of the list are greater scalability and improved synchronization.

Because the data in an IDAA is stored separately from the data in the primary Db2 for z/OS system, when the data is changed in Db2 for z/OS it must be migrated to the IDAA. This causes latency, where the data differs between the two systems. Of course, this is not ideal.

Well, the latest and greatest iteration of IDAA has greatly improved things with Integrated Synchronization, which provides low-latency data coherency. Db2 12 for z/OS (FL 500) delivers the Log Data Provider, which to capture changes and funnel them to IDAA. It is quick, uses very little CPU, and is zIIP-enabled. This greatly improves the latency between Db2 for z/OS data and IDAA data, to the point of it becoming mostly irrelevant.

Additionally, V7 was the first version of IDAA to allow deployment on IFLs, instead of on a separate physical piece of hardware. This means you can accelerate Db2 for z/OS queries completely on the mainframe. And V7.5 expands the scalability of IFLs.

Important Information for Laggards

Perhaps the most important piece of information in today’s blog post though is for those of you who are still running older versions of IDAA… specifically, V4. The end of service date for IDAA V4 is imminent – April 30, 2020 – and there will be no extension of this date. So if you are still on V4, it is time to upgrade!

Fortunately, you can upgrade to IDAA V5 at no cost. Sure, V5 is not the most current version of IDAA, but IBM has not issued an end of service (EOS) date for it yet. The probable EOS date is tentatively set for the first half of 2023 (which is the same for the IBM PureData System for Analytics N3001 on which this earlier IDAA is based.

Today’s Bottom IDAA Line

If you are looking for an efficient, cost-effective query accelerator for your complex Db2 queries you should look into IDAA V7.5.

And if you are still running V4, update soon (by the end of the month?) to avoid running on an out of service version of IDAA.

Monday, April 06, 2020

Db2 Quarantine Book Sale

Just a quick note to offer up a discount on my latest book, A Guide to Db2 Performance for Application Developers, during the quarantine. The book was written for application programmers, providing guidance and assistance for writing efficient application code for Db2. The book covers both Db2 for z/OS and Db2 for LUW, and is available in both printed and eBook formats:


So how do you get a discount? 
Then you will need to decide if you want the ebook or the print book, and when checking out, enter the correct coupon code. 
  • For the print book, use code db2N for 10% off
  • For the ebook, use code db2W for 5% off

Then enter your payment details and enjoy!

This book will make you a better programmer by teaching you how to write efficient code to access Db2 databases. Whether you write applications on the mainframe or distributed systems, this book will teach you practices, methods, and techniques for optimizing your SQL and applications as you build them. Write efficient applications and become your DBA's favorite developer by learning the techniques outlined in this book!

What you will get from reading this book is a well-grounded basis for designing and developing efficient Db2 applications that perform well.

If you'd rather order the book somewhere else (without the discounts) it is also available at:
But I hope you'll order a copy today for yourself, your favorite programmer, or better yet, your least-favorite programmer (because the book will help improve their abilities)!

Thursday, April 02, 2020

A Condensed 35-Year History of DB2 for z/OS (...and Db2 for z/OS)


Let's go back in time... over three decades ago... back to the wild and woolly 1980s! And watch our favorite DBMS, DB2, grow up over time.

DB2 Version 1 Release 1 was announced on June 7, 1983, and it became generally available on Tuesday, April 2, 1985. I wonder if it was ready on April 1st but not released because of April Fool’s Day? Initial DB2 development focused on the basics of making a relational DBMS work. Early releases of DB2 were viewed by many as an “information center” DBMS, not for production workloads, like IMS was.

Version 1 Release 2 was announced on February 4, 1986 and was released for general availability a month later on March 7, 1986. Can you imagine waiting only a month for a new release of DB2 these days? But that is how it happened back then. Same thing for Version 1 Release 3, which was announced on May 19, 1987 and became GA on June 26, 1987. DB2 V1R3 saw the introduction of DATE data types.

You might notice that IBM delivered “releases” of DB2 back in the 1980s, whereas today (and ever since V3) there have only been versions. Versions are major changes, whereas releases are not quite as significant as a version.

Version 2 Release 1 was announced in April 1988 and delivered in September 1988. Here we start to see the gap widening again between announcement and delivery. V2R1 was a significant release in the history of DB2, a bellwether of sorts for when DB2 began to be viewed as capable of supporting mission-critical, transaction processing workloads. Not only did V2R1 provide significant performance enhancements but it also signaled the introduction of declarative Referential Integrity (RI) constraints.

No sooner than V2R1 became GA than IBM announced Version 2 Release 2 on October 4, 1988. But it was not until a year later that it became generally available on September 23, 1988. DB2 V2R2 again bolstered performance in many ways. It also saw the introduction of distributed database support (private protocol) across MVS systems.

Version 2 Release 3 was announced on September 5, 1990, and became generally available on October 25, 1991. Two very significant features were added in V2R3: segmented table spaces and packages. Segmented table spaces quickly became a de facto standard and packages made DB2 application programs easier to support. DB2 V2R3 is also the version that beefed up distributed support with Distributed Relational Database Architecture (DRDA).

Along comes DB2 Version 3, announced in November 1993 and GA in December 1993. Now it may look like things sped up again here, but not really. This is when the early support program for DB2 started. Early support was announced in March 1993 and delivered to customers in June 1993. V3 greatly expanded the number of buffer pool options available (from 5 pools to 80), and many advances were made for DB2 to take better advantage of the System 390 environment, including support for hardware-assisted compression and hiperpools. It was also V3 that introduced I/O parallelism for the first time.

Version 4 signaled another significant milestone in the history of DB2. It was highlighted by the introduction of Type 2 indexes, which removed the need to lock index pages (or subpages, now obsolete). Prior to V4, index locking was a particularly thorny performance problem that vexed many shops. Data Sharing made its debut in V4, too, and with it, DB2 achieved new heights of scalability and availability allowing users to upgrade without an outage and to add new subsystems to a group “on the fly.” DB2 V4 also introduced stored procedures, as well as CP parallelism.

In June 1997 DB2 Version 5 became generally available. It was the first DB2 version to be referred to as DB2 for OS/390 (previously it was DB2 for MVS). Not as significant as V4, we see the trend of even-numbered releases being bigger and more significant than odd-numbered releases (of course, that is just my opinion). V5 was touted by IBM as the e-business and BI version. It included Sysplex parallelism, prepared statement caching, reoptimization, online REORG, and conformance to the SQL-92 standard.

Version 6 brings us to 1999 and the introduction of the Universal Database term to the DB2 moniker. The “official” name of the product became DB2 Universal Database for OS/390. And the Release Guide swelled to over 600 pages! Six categories of improvements were introduced with V6 spanning object-relational extensions, network computing, performance and availability, capacity improvements, data sharing enhancements, and user productivity. The biggest of the new features were SQLJ, inline statistics, triggers, large objects (LOBs), user-defined functions, and distinct types.

Version 6 is also somewhat unique in that there was this “thing” typically referred to as the V6 refresh. It added functionality to DB2 without there being a new release or version. The new functionality in the refresh included SAVEPOINTs, identity columns, declared temporary tables, and performance enhancements (including star join).

March 2001 brings us to DB2 Version 7, another “smaller” version of DB2. Developed and released around the time of the Year 2000 hubbub, it offered much-improved utilities and some nice new SQL functionality including scrollable cursors, limited FETCH, and row expressions. Unicode support was also introduced in Db2 V7.

DB2 Version 8 followed, but not immediately. IBM took advantage of Y2K and the general desire of shops to avoid change during this period to take its time and deliver the most significant and feature-laden version of DB2 ever. V8 had more new lines of code than DB2 V1R1 had total lines of code!

With DB2 9 for z/OS, we drop the “V” from the name. Is that in response to Oracle’s naming conventions? Well, we do add a space between the DB2 and the version number because we don’t want to talk about DB-twenty-nine! A lot of great new functionality comes with DB2 9 including additional database definition on demand capabilities, binary data types, and a lot of new SQL capabilities including OLAP functions and EXCEPT/INTERSECT. But probably the biggest new feature is pureXML, which allows you to store DB2 data as native XML. The XML is stored natively as a new data type that can be searched and analyzed without the need to reformat it. The approach was novel in that it  supports native XML, basically enabling dual storage engines.

And that brings us to DB2 10 for z/OS. This version of DB2 was built to take advantage of many zEnterprise (the latest new mainframe at the time) features to deliver scalability. Examples include improved compression, cache optimization, blades for running the Smart Analytics Optimizer, etc. 

Additional capabilities included many performance improvements (BIND, IN-list, utilities, etc.), hash organized table spaces, high-performance DBATs (DDF threads) forced to use RELEASE COMMIT, parallel index updating, efficient caching of dynamic SQL with literals, temporal data support, safe query optimization, improved access path hints, access to currently committed data, new TIMESTAMP precision and time zones, and buffer pool options for pinning objects in memory.

In October 2013 we got another new version, DB2 11 for z/OS. Click on that link if you want all the details, but some highlights included transparent archiving, global variables, improved SQL PL, APREUSE(WARN), significant utility improvements, DROP COLUMN support, and JSON support with IBM BigInsights.

And that brings us to the present day, with DB2 12 for z/OS as the current (and soon to be only) supported version of Db2. Released for general availability in October 2016, DB2 12 for z/OS abandons the traditional new release cycle that IBM has followed for decades, adopting a new continuous delivery model. New functionality is now delivered in Function Levels (FLs) that are easily applied and delivered much more rapidly than in the past. Indeed, the current Db2 function level is FL506, which means there have been 6 new function levels added since 2016.

Version 12 brought with it a plethora of new capabilities including virtual storage enhancements, optimization improvements, and improved control over the introduction of new SQL capabilities. DB2 12 for z/OS delivered many improvements for both application development and database administration. Examples of new application capabilities include:
  • Additional support for triggers, arrays, global variables, pureXML, and JSON
  • MERGE statement enhancements
  • SQL pagination support
  • Support for Unicode columns in an EBCDIC table
  • Piece-wise deletion of data
  • Support for temporal referential constraint
  • More flexibility in defining application periods for temporal tables
  • PERCENTILE function support
  • Resource limits for static SQL statements
  • Db2 REST services improve efficiency and security
  • DevOps with Db2: Automated deployment of applications with IBM UrbanCode Deploy
Examples of new DBA and SYSADM capabilities include:

  • Installation or migration without requiring SYSADM
  • Improved availability when altering index compression
  • Online schema enhancements
  • Improved catalog availability
  • Object ownership transfer
  • Improved data validation after running DSN1COPY
  • Automatic start of profiles at Db2 start
  • Increased partition sizes and simplified partition management for partition-by-range table spaces with relative page numbering
  • Ability to add partitions between existing logical partitions
  • UNLOAD privilege for the UNLOAD utility
  • Temporal versioning for Db2 catalog tables
  • Statistics collection enhancements for SQL performance    
Of course, these are just some of the V12 improvements; there are many more (as well as all of the Function Level improvements)!

Then sometime in the middle of 2017, IBM decided to change the name of DB2 by making the uppercase B a lowercase b. So now the name of our beloved DBMS is Db2. Nobody has been able to explain to me what the benefit of this was, so don’t ask me!

The Bottom Line

I worked with DB2 way back in its Version 1 days, and I’ve enjoyed watching DB2 grow over its first 35 years. Of course, we did not cover every new feature and capability of each version and release, only the highlights. Perhaps this journey back through time will help you to remember when you jumped on board with Db2 and relational database technology. I am happy to have been associated with Db2 (and DB2) for its first 35 years and I look forward to many more years of working with Db2…